IN RE HUEBNER v. STATE, 233 Ind. 363 (1954)

118 N.E.2d 898

IN THE MATTER OF HUEBNER.

No. 28,896.Supreme Court of Indiana.
Filed April 29, 1954. Rehearing denied May 27, 1954.

ATTORNEY AND CLIENT — Revocation of Admission to Practice Law — Disciplinary Commission — Hearing-Evidence — Rules of Court. — Where information was filed pursuant to Rules of Court by Disciplinary Commission and a commissioner appointed who heard evidence, and made report recommending name of attorney be stricken from rolls, a review of the record, shows that the report of Commissioner is sustained by evidence, and the name of attorney is ordered stricken from roll of attorneys.

Original action by Information in Revocation of Admission to Practice Law as an Attorney was filed by Disciplinary Commission and report of Commissioner was that name of Carl A. Huebner be stricken from rolls.

Report Approved.

Owen W. Crumpacker, Harold J. Douthett, Wilbur J. Glendening, Alfred H. Highland, William L. Travis, and Harold C. Wagner,
all of Hammond, for Disciplinary Commission.

Page 364

(Charles C. Baker, of Indianapolis, Wilbur F. Dassel, of Evansville, James R. Newkirk, of Fort Wayne, Robert H. Moore,
of Gary, and Chester A. Bielby, of Lawrenceburg, Disciplinary Commission Members.)

Albert H. Gavit, of Gary, for defendant.

FLANAGAN, J.

Pursuant to the rules of this court, Information in Revocation of Admission to Practice Law as an Attorney was filed and referred to the Disciplinary Commission, Charles C. Baker, Wilbur F. Dassel, Robert H. Moore, Charles E. Bielby, and James R. Newkirk. The duly appointed Commissioner, Honorable Alvin F. Marsh, has reported, after hearing, recommending that the name of Carl A. Huebner be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before this court.

Upon careful examination of the record, we find that the report of the Commissioner is sustained by the evidence and should be approved.

Report approved, and the name of Carl A. Huebner is now ordered stricken from the roll of attorneys practicing before this court.

Bobbitt, Emmert, and Gilkison, JJ., concur.

Draper, C.J., not participating.

NOTE. — Reported in 118 N.E.2d 898.

Page 365

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

HAMPTON v. STATE, 961 N.E.2d 480 (2012)

961 N.E.2d 480 (2012) Kevin L. HAMPTON, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee…

1 month ago

WADLE v. STATE, 151 N.E.3d 227 (Ind. 2020)

151 N.E.3d 227 (2020) Jordan B. WADLE, Appellant (Defendant), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff).…

3 years ago

HURLEY v. EDDINGFIELD, 156 Ind. 416 (1901)

Supreme Court of Indiana. HURLEY v. EDDINGFIELD 156 Ind. 416 (1901) BAKER, J. The appellant…

7 years ago

KNAPP v. STATE, 79 N.E. 1076 (1907)

79 N.E. 1076 (Ind. 1907)168 Ind. 153 Knapp v. The State No. 20,765Supreme Court of…

9 years ago

STATE BD. OF PUBLIC WELFARE v. TIOGA PINES, 575 N.E.2d 303 (Ind. App. 1991)

575 N.E.2d 303 INDIANA STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC WELFARE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, AND…

9 years ago

MID-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORP. v. STARNES, 104 Ind. App. 190 (1937)

8 N.E.2d 411 MID-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. STARNES. No. 15,471.Court of Appeals of Indiana. Filed…

9 years ago