504 N.E.2d 285
No. 1175S341.Supreme Court of Indiana.
March 3, 1987.
ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT
Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and files “Amended Findings of Fact and Recommendation of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission” recommending that the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law.
And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the requirements of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 4, have been met and that the Commission’s recommendation should be approved.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Petitioner, William C. D’Amico, be and he hereby
Page 286
is reinstated as an attorney of the Bar of this Court, effective immediately.
All Justices concur.
961 N.E.2d 480 (2012) Kevin L. HAMPTON, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee…
151 N.E.3d 227 (2020) Jordan B. WADLE, Appellant (Defendant), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff).…
Supreme Court of Indiana. HURLEY v. EDDINGFIELD 156 Ind. 416 (1901) BAKER, J. The appellant…
79 N.E. 1076 (Ind. 1907)168 Ind. 153 Knapp v. The State No. 20,765Supreme Court of…
575 N.E.2d 303 INDIANA STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC WELFARE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, AND…
8 N.E.2d 411 MID-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. STARNES. No. 15,471.Court of Appeals of Indiana. Filed…