MATTER OF EVERITT, 661 N.E.2d 1208 (Ind. 1996)

661 N.E.2d 1208

IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS E. EVERITT.

No. 72S00-9410-DI-985.Supreme Court of Indiana.
March 8, 1996.

ORDER OF SUSPENSION PENDING PROSECUTION
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Sections 11(f) and 14(g), files a motion for suspension pending prosecution.[1] The hearing officer in this matter has submitted his recommendation to this Court on the Commission’s request, recommending that the respondent’s license to practice law in this state be immediately suspended pending final prosecution of this disciplinary action based on the respondent’s consent to such suspension.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the respondent should be suspended from the practice of law pending further order of this Court or final determination of any resulting disciplinary proceeding. Accordingly, we adopt the hearing officer’s recommendation that the respondent’s suspension commence immediately. Pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(15)(b),[2]
within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order, the respondent may petition this Court for a review and dissolution of this Order.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the respondent, Thomas E. Everitt, 59 1/2 East Wardell, P.O. Box 351, Scottsburg, Indiana 47170, is suspended from the practice of law effective immediately.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to send notice of this Order by certified or registered mail to the respondent, to the Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entities pursuant to the provisions of Admis.Disc.R. 23(3)(d).

All Justices concur.

[1] Admission and Discipline Rule 23 was amended was amended effective February 1, 1996, before the Commission filed its present motion for suspension pending prosecution. Former subsections (11)(f) and 14(g) are now incorporated into Admis.Disc.R. 23(11.1)(b).
[2] Now Admis.Disc.R. 23(11.1)(b)(2).
jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

HAMPTON v. STATE, 961 N.E.2d 480 (2012)

961 N.E.2d 480 (2012) Kevin L. HAMPTON, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee…

4 weeks ago

WADLE v. STATE, 151 N.E.3d 227 (Ind. 2020)

151 N.E.3d 227 (2020) Jordan B. WADLE, Appellant (Defendant), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff).…

3 years ago

HURLEY v. EDDINGFIELD, 156 Ind. 416 (1901)

Supreme Court of Indiana. HURLEY v. EDDINGFIELD 156 Ind. 416 (1901) BAKER, J. The appellant…

7 years ago

KNAPP v. STATE, 79 N.E. 1076 (1907)

79 N.E. 1076 (Ind. 1907)168 Ind. 153 Knapp v. The State No. 20,765Supreme Court of…

9 years ago

STATE BD. OF PUBLIC WELFARE v. TIOGA PINES, 575 N.E.2d 303 (Ind. App. 1991)

575 N.E.2d 303 INDIANA STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC WELFARE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, AND…

9 years ago

MID-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORP. v. STARNES, 104 Ind. App. 190 (1937)

8 N.E.2d 411 MID-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. STARNES. No. 15,471.Court of Appeals of Indiana. Filed…

9 years ago