ORDER AMENDING RULES OF TRIAL PROCEDURE (Ind. 7-1-2005)

ORDER AMENDING RULES OF TRIAL PROCEDURE.

Supreme Court of Indiana.
July 1, 2005.

BRENT E. DICKSON, Acting Chief Justice of Indiana

Under the authority vested in this Court to provide by rule for the procedure employed in all courts of this state and this Court’s inherent authority to supervise the administration of all courts of this state, Rules 3.1, 5, and 56 of the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure are amended to read as follows (deletions shown by striking and new text shown by underlining):

INDIANA RULES OF TRIAL PROCEDURE
. . .

Rule 3.1. Appearance

. . .

(H) Temporary Appearance. In the event an attorney,different from any specifically identified in a previously filedappearance, is temporarily representing a party in a proceedingbefore the court, through filing a pleading with the court or inany other capacity including discovery, the new attorney shallfile an appearance form. The appearance form shall contain theinformation set out in Section (A) (1) and (2) above, shallprovide the name, attorney number and all contact information ofthe attorney who has filed the prior appearance in the case, thenew attorney’s temporary status, and the date the temporaryappearance shall end. The court shall not be required to act onthe temporary appearance unless the new temporary attorney hasnot appeared at the request of a party’s previously identifiedcounsel.

. . .

Rule 5. Service and Filing of Pleading and Other Papers

. . .

(G) Filing of Documents and Information Excluded from PublicAccess and Confidential Pursuant to Administrative rule 9(G)(1).
Every document filed prepared by a lawyer or party for filing
in a case shall separately identify information excluded from public access pursuant to Admin. R. 9(G)(1) as follows:

(1) Whole documents that are excluded from public access pursuant to Administrative Rule 9(G)(1) shall be tendered on light green paper or have a light green coversheet attached to the document, marked “Not for Public Access” or “Confidential.”
(2) When only a portion of a document contains information excluded from public access pursuant to Administrative Rule 9(G)(1), said information shall be omitted [or redacted] from the filed document, and set forth on a separate accompanying document on light green paper conspicuously marked “Not for Public Access” or “Confidential” and clearly designated [or identifying] the caption and number of the case and the document and location within the document to which the redacted material pertains.
(3) With respect to documents filed in electronic format, the trial court, by order or local rule, may provide for compliance with this rule in manner that separates and protects access to information excluded from public access.
(4) This rule does not apply to a record sealed by the court pursuant to IC 5-14-3-5.5 or otherwise, nor to records, documents, or information filed in cases to which public access is prohibited pursuant to Administrative Rule (9) (H)(G).

. . .

Rule 56. Summary judgment

. . .

(C) Motion and proceedings thereon. The motion and any supporting affidavits shall be served in accordance with the provisions of Rule 5. An adverse party shall have thirty (30) days after service of the motion to serve a response and any opposing affidavits. The court may conduct a hearing on themotion. However, upon motion of any party made no later than ten(10) days after the response was filed or was due, the court
shall conduct a hearing on the motion which shall be held not less than ten (10) days after the time for filing the response.

. . .

These amendments shall take effect January 1, 2006.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the clerk of each circuit court in the state of Indiana; Attorney General of Indiana; Legislative Services Agency and its Office of Code Revision; Administrator, Indiana Supreme Court; Administrator, Indiana Court of Appeals; Administrator, Indiana Tax Court; Public Defender of Indiana; Prosecuting Attorney’s Council; Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission; Indiana Supreme Court Commission for Continuing Legal Education; Indiana Board of Law Examiners; Indiana Judicial Center; Division of State Court Administration; Indiana Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program; the libraries of all law schools in this state; the Michie Company; and the West Group.

The West Group is directed to publish this Order in the advance sheets of this Court.

The Clerks of the Circuit Courts are directed to bring this Order to the attention of all judges within their respective counties and to post this Order for examination by the Bar and general public.

DONE at Indianapolis, Indiana, this _______ day of July 1, 2005.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

HAMPTON v. STATE, 961 N.E.2d 480 (2012)

961 N.E.2d 480 (2012) Kevin L. HAMPTON, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee…

2 weeks ago

WADLE v. STATE, 151 N.E.3d 227 (Ind. 2020)

151 N.E.3d 227 (2020) Jordan B. WADLE, Appellant (Defendant), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff).…

3 years ago

HURLEY v. EDDINGFIELD, 156 Ind. 416 (1901)

Supreme Court of Indiana. HURLEY v. EDDINGFIELD 156 Ind. 416 (1901) BAKER, J. The appellant…

7 years ago

KNAPP v. STATE, 79 N.E. 1076 (1907)

79 N.E. 1076 (Ind. 1907)168 Ind. 153 Knapp v. The State No. 20,765Supreme Court of…

9 years ago

STATE BD. OF PUBLIC WELFARE v. TIOGA PINES, 575 N.E.2d 303 (Ind. App. 1991)

575 N.E.2d 303 INDIANA STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC WELFARE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, AND…

9 years ago

MID-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORP. v. STARNES, 104 Ind. App. 190 (1937)

8 N.E.2d 411 MID-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. STARNES. No. 15,471.Court of Appeals of Indiana. Filed…

9 years ago